Eugene Mallove Dr. Eugene Mallove died on May 14, , aged He was found at the end of his driveway, beaten to death during an alleged robbery, having received several blunt-force injuries to his head and neck. An autopsy ruled his death as murder.
|Published (Last):||15 January 2007|
|PDF File Size:||7.70 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.56 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Eugene F. Whether you are Conservative, Liberal, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, or Anarchist, and whether you may be Agnostic, Buddhist, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Atheist, or some other category of spirituality, this message is directed to all people of good will like you … Dear Friend: Here are some thoughts by wise thinkers—background for this urgent appeal for your consideration and support of research and development of radically new forms of energy.
If there is an exception to any rule, and if it can be proved by observation, that rule is wrong. Richard P. Feynman , Nobel Laureate in Physics The progress of physics is unsystematic…The result is that physics sometimes passes on to new territory before sufficiently consolidating territory already entered; it assumes sometimes too easily that results are secure and bases further advance on them, thereby laying itself open to further possible retreat. This is easy to understand in a subject in which development of the great fundamental concepts is often slow; a new generation appears before the concept has been really salted down, and assumes in the uncritical enthusiasm of youth that everything taught in school is gospel truth and forgets the doubts and tentative gropings of the great founders in its eagerness to make applications of the concepts and pass on to the next triumph…But each new young physicist…is in danger of forgetting all the past rumination and present uncertainty, and of starting with an uncritical acceptance of the concepts in the stage of development in which he finds them.
Percy W. Nonetheless, he somehow senses that a physics revolution may be upon us. He is much more accurate than he can imagine, but not at all for reasons that he would readily accept! Having the intellectual problems identified by physics Nobel Laureate P. Bridgman in the quotation above, Lederman has not been looking at a large body of research that will indeed revolutionize the foundations of physics and give us command of fantastic new forms of energy.
Too bad for Lederman; and too bad for us all that he has not been paying attention. We could use the support of people like Lederman…if they would only come to their senses, that is, examine open-mindedly the validity of experimental data that challenges their cherished theories. Physics Professor Martin Hoffert, leader of that research group, told the press that the United States would have to undertake an urgent energy research crash program, like the Manhattan atomic bomb project or the Apollo lunar missions.
Rather, all that is needed perhaps are only several tens of millions of dollars to create robust prototype electric power generators based on new energy physics discoveries that have already been made. That is what this Appeal for Support is all about: to raise consciousness and funding for these radical alternative new energy sources.
Question: Do you believe that it is possible that modern science has overlooked or ignored major scientific discoveries, which—if developed into technologies— would revolutionize almost every aspect of civilization? It has! I will not catalogue the many horrors and troubles of this world that could be reduced or eliminated with an abundant, safe, and clean, radically new form of energy, if it were to be embodied in widely used technologies. You know these troubles already. But I do want to tell you about a significant path toward solving many of these problems, which we can all begin to take now, but about which you may have heard very little.
You may have thought that no such path could exist. Let me assure you that it does and that thousands of researchers are already on it. They have traveled this unbeaten path to a new era for far too long without adequate support. I should know, I happen to be one of them. Yes, we have not reached our goals, but thanks to meticulous scientific research, huge sacrifices, and tireless work against great opposition, these objectives are now much closer to being realized.
The basic scientific direction of the path forward has already been mapped out. We need your support to go further on the path and reach our common destination: A world of abundant, clean, and safe energy from sources that have no centralized geopolitical control. Please attend to this appeal. I am most certainly not asking you to accept my claims at face value. But you must read, consider, study or review the compendious referenced material, investigate it, and then, I hope, you will be moved to take action.
If you still have questions about these claims that need answering, I and my colleagues are available to answer them with facts, not hand-waving.
Who am I to ask anything of you on behalf of others, whether your attention for these brief moments, or for your financial and moral support? I am a scientist and an engineer with two engineering degrees from MIT , and a doctorate from the Harvard University School of Public Health I have appeared on many national radio programs, and for a time in the mids I was proud to have been a regular science and technology broadcaster for The Voice of America.
I am telling you something about me, not to elevate myself, but to convey to you something of my experience, sincerity, and integrity. By sweeping away stubbornly held preconceptions, he bares the truth implicit in a provocative variety of experiments. Feynman and Sin Itiro Tomanaga. Here is how one famous nuclear science professor at my alma mater MIT reacted to my request to him in to study the summary reports from two pioneering Ph. Herman Feshbach, May , on the telephone to Dr.
Feshbach so vehemently defended, read my page report about this monumental tragedy at www. But as a first step, you should reflect on the broader history of science, which is so fraught with revolutionary leaps and paradigm shifts. These have often been made against great opposition—with revolutionary data staring an older, unaccepting generation of scientists right in the face!
Read this Appeal carefully and then reconsider your opinion about who is telling the truth and who is defending falsehood about revolutionary new prospects for science and civilization. For almost nine years I have been the editor of Infinite Energy, the magazine of new energy science and technology. Though it is now small in circulation, Infinite Energy is received worldwide in some forty countries.
My friend and colleague, Sir Arthur C. Clarke, has supported with words and resources some of our efforts on behalf of new energy. The research that Infinite Energy covers suggests that there are at least three major categories of radically new sources of energy that civilization is on the verge of being able to tap and reduce to practical technologies. These are the completely new forms of energy for which this Appeal for Support is being issued.
Eugene F. Whether you are Conservative, Liberal, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, or Anarchist, and whether you may be Agnostic, Buddhist, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Atheist, or some other category of spirituality, this message is directed to all people of good will like you … Dear Friend: Here are some thoughts by wise thinkers—background for this urgent appeal for your consideration and support of research and development of radically new forms of energy. If there is an exception to any rule, and if it can be proved by observation, that rule is wrong. Richard P.
Dr. Eugene Mallove, Torch Bearer for Cold Fusion, Slain
From an early age, he showed great interest in science and especially astronomy. On September 9, , Gene and Joanne married. They had two children, Kimberlyn, born in , and Ethan, born in In , he and Gregory Matloff wrote a paper about using solar sails to reach Alpha Centauri , the nearest star to our sun. They calculated that the trip would take several hundred years and that the ship would have to withstand accelerations of 60 g. Mallove resigned from MIT in because he said MIT was hiding cold fusion data, partly to protect funding for and reputation of traditional fusion research.
The Coldest Case
Eugene Mallove. He plead guilty to first-degree manslaughter and accessory to third-degree robbery. He was sentenced on January 6, to 58 years in prison. She was forced to return to the scene of the crime and participate in and witness the final blows that killed Gene.